Ⅰ.INTRODUCTION
Parkinson's disease is a chronic degenerative disease caused by abnormalities of dopaminergic neurons[1]. According to related studies, the prevalence of parkinson's disease is reported to be between 150 and 200 per 100,000 people and between 1 and 1.6 percent over the age of 65 and is increasing with aging[2]. Currently, parkinson's disease is reported to be caused by the loss of a part of dopaminergic cells and the degeneration of the dopaminergic neuronal circuit of corpus striatum, resulting in dopamine deficiency in dopaminergic neuron junctions[3]. Radiologic diagnoses such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are only useful for differential diagnosis of diseases such as cerebral vascular disorders, hydrocephalus, calcification, and there is much limitation in diagnosis[4,5]. Conversely, positron emission tomography (PET) scan can diagnose parkinson's disease using ligands involved in dopamine transport and have an advantage of detecting disease progression (Fig. 1)[6].
As a representative nuclear medicine scan to diagnose parkinson's disease, there is PET-CT scan using 18F FP-CIT as a radioactive tracer and according to results of studies, it has been reported that the diagnostic accuracy using PET is superior to that of MRI by 15%[7]. This test identifies the extent of disease progression, how to diagnose and how to treat it according to the extent to which the radiopharmaceuticals are consumed in the corpus striatum. Recently, nuclear medicine equipment has been able to combine the existing single PET with equipment such as CT and MRI to obtain the correction effect through lack of anatomical information and attenuation mapping in PET images, and because of these advantages, PET-CT equipment is increasingly used in domestic hospitals and is already widely used[8]. On the other hand, while PET-CT has the advantage of obtaining information about the physiological function and anatomical position of the human body by using PET and CT simultaneously, the radiation dose received by the patient with the PET and CT examinations can not be overlooked[9]. There is software suggested by the equipment company for dose reduction, but it is not applied because it is inefficient in the brain which is composed of relatively simple structure compared to abdomen[10]. In addition, although studies have been actively conducted on the improvement of radiological exposure to PET and the improvement of image quality in the situation where the hazard of medical radiation exposure is a social issue, data on dose results for dual exposures of PET and CT in patients utilizes reference data from equipment companies[11]. Therefore the purpose of the study is to produce a brain phantom simulating c orpus striatum, which c an evaluate the progression of parkinson's disease, and investigate plans to reduce the brain exposure dose to CT while maintaining optimal image quality during PET-CT examinations.
Ⅱ.Materials and Methods
1.Production for brain phantom
The brain is enclosed in the cerebrospinal fluid of the skull and is contained in the cerebrospinal fluid, mainly composed of soft tissues such as nerve cells and nerve fibers[12]. The effective atomic number according to the composition of human body is about 7.41 in soft tissue, 7.64 in air, and 20 in bone. Due to this difference, photons, such as gamma rays, attenuate as they interact with the material, for example, absorption through the photoelectric effect and scattering through the compton scattering and the higher the effective atomic number of a substance, the stronger this phenomenon becomes[13]. The principle of acquisition of nuclear medicine images is to reconstruct the signals of the photons emitted from the human body by collecting them with a detector and for examination of the brain, it is necessary to correct the degree of attenuation in the skull[14]. Thus, in brain phantom production, it is important to simulate each organ with a material that is as close as possible to the effective atomic number of each human tissue[15]. In this background, the brain phantom was made by measuring the head size of 10 adults based on CT data after PET-CT, and w as c onstructed t o inject r adioactive isotopes into the corpus striatum. The phantom was divided into upper part and lower part and the upper part was inserted with two inserts of 2 ㎝ in diameter and 5 ㎝ in height indicating a corpus striatum as a disk having a diameter of 18 ㎝. The lower part was a cylinder with a diameter of 18 ㎝ and a height of 25 ㎝ and it was filled with water and represented as background (Fig. 2).
As a method for simulating the skull, high density (2.20E+00 g/㎝3) teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene, PTFE, mean excitation energy=99.10 eV) was used and teflon is composed only of carbon with atom number 6 and fluorine with 9 and the weight ratios of each are 0.240183 and 0.759817. Teflon suitable for use as a phantom material using nuclear medical radiopharmaceuticals since it is not infringed by molten alkali metal and all other chemicals except fluorine gas at high temperature. Therefore, the surface of the brain phantom was fabricated using teflon as a material (Fig. 3).
2.Image acquisition
1)PET acquisition
Biograph mCT40 (Siemens, Germany) and the brain phantom produced by the study was used to conduct the experiment. 18F radioisotope was maintained at 3:1 radioactivity with a hot sphere (background ratio of 59: 19 kBq/㏄), dedicated brain holder was equipped and data was acquired for 5 minutes. The obtained image was reconstructed by applying True X (iterations: 6, subsets: 24) and gaussian filter (Fig. 4).
2)CT acquisition
CT images were obtained by varying tube voltage (100, 120 kVp) and tube current (80, 140 and 200 mAs). At this time, the CT imaging reference condition was set to tube voltage of 120 kVp and tube current of 140 mAs and was compared with other conditions.
3.Image analysis and evaluation parameter
1)SNR
SNR (signal to noise ratio), which is one of the methods of physical evaluation of image, is used to measure the intensity of the signal versus noise, and the signal intensity of the region of interest can be calculated by the standard deviation of the background noise[16]. The ROI (region of interest) was set in the same way for the ±1 slice based on the 10th slice (Fig. 5). Using the average counts and standard deviations of the ROI regions, the images were evaluated with the average SNR values of three slices using equation (1).
2)CRChot
CRChot used equation (2)[17]. 1 hot sphere ROI and 10 backgrounds were set equal (Fig. 6). Chot is the average count of the hot sphere, Cbkgd is the average count of the background, and ahot and abkgd are the ratio of the radioactivity of the hot sphere and background[18]. To make the true discovery that help medical team deliver the best outcome to the patient, or potentially impact the standard of care for all patients, It need the accuracy and consistency of absolute quantitation. Obtained images were analyzed using functional imaging Xeleris workstation ver. 3.0 (GE healthcare, USA).
3)Effective dose
The values of DLP (dose length product) (mGy·㎝) according to each condition and the conversion factor k (mSv·mGy-1㎝-1) of head were applied based on tube voltage (120 kVp) and tube current (140 mAs) and estimated effective dose (E) was calculated using equation (3) and the dose was evaluated for each condition (Table 1)[19].
Ⅲ.Results
The tube voltage (100 kVp), tube current (80, 140, 200 mAs), tube voltage (120 kVp) and tube current (80 mAs) showed average SNR value of 6.11 and was 1.61% lower than the reference condition tube voltage (120 kVp) and tube current (140 mAs). The condition of tube voltage (120 kVp) and tube current (200 mAs) showed the same SNR value as the reference condition, and the SNR value according to the condition did not show much difference (Table 2).
Difference between CRChot values and reference conditions for tube voltage (100, 120 kVp) and tube current (80, 140, 200 mAs). A CRChot value similar to the reference condition (120 kVp, 140 mAs) was obtained under all conditions (Table 3).
While on the basis of tube voltage (120 kVp) and tube current (140 mAs) there was reduction in exposure dose 66.6%, 41.6%, 16.6%, and 41.6% respectively, under the conditions of tube voltage (100 kVp) and tube current (80, 140, 200 mAs), tube voltage (120 kVp) and tube current (80 mAs), exposure dose was increased by 29.4% under conditions of tube voltage (120 kVp) and tube current (200 mAs), (Table 4), (Fig. 7).
Ⅳ.Discussion
In this study, a brain phantom to evaluate the corpus striatum was created and evaluated for image quality and exposure reduction measures. The patient's head circumference was measured and high-density Teflon material was placed on the phantom surface to simulate the skull. To investigate the exposure dose according to CT condition, after injecting a certain amount of radiopharmaceuticals, image quality was evaluated as a factor of SNR and CRChot w hile c hanging 6 CT conditions of tube voltage (100, 120 kVp) and tube current (80, 140, 200 mAs), and the effective dose according to the condition was calculated and compared with the results obtained through the evaluation factors. The result values of SNR and CRChot according to the change of CT condition were not significantly changed. However, it can be seen that under the low condition, the dose to the DLP and the brain is reduced by changing the condition of the CT, and as the tube voltage and tube current were increased, the corresponding dose was also changed. According to previous studies, dose changes of CT for attenuation correction in PET-CT did not significantly affect image quality. Therefore, the dose of CT for attenuation correction other than diagnosis should be lowered at a level that does not change the image quality[20]. In addition, in the CT dose and phantom image evaluation studies for attenuation correction in pediatric PET-CT images, attenuation corrected PET images according to CT conditions did not affect SNR[21].
Since this study has limitations in conducting experiments with actual patients, only experiments with phantoms were conducted. In addition, it is not a phantom conforming to international standards such as NEMA (national electrial manufactures association) and IEC (international electrotechnical commission), but a phantom manufactured by measuring actual head circumference, thus it is problematic to apply it directly to human body. At present, the brain phantom mainly used globally is the hoffman brain phantom[22]. However, the hoffman brain phantom has limitations in evaluating other parts of the head, such as the corpus striatum, and many studies use anthropomorphic alderson RSD (radiology support devices) phantom for the evaluation of corpus striatum[23]. The phantom test to improve the quality of nuclear medicine images is mainly imported from foreign countries and the purchase price is very expensive, so there are several limitations. Therefore, in the reality that phantom production in domestic experiment is difficult, it is considered that it will be helpful in improving the performance of the equipment and image quality through the production of a phantom. Also, it is expected that the proportion of phantom experiments to corpus striatum will increase gradually, and based on the present phantom production, it is considered that a better phantom will be produced in domestic experiment and the quality of images will be greatly improved.
Ⅴ.Conclusion
As a result of comparing the quality of the image by setting the SNR of the PET-CT image and the image evaluation factor of the CRChot using the phantom simulating the skull-corpus striatum produced in the study, no specific quality change of the image was found according to the set CT condition. This fact suggests that the quality of the images acquired under the existing dose conditions can be obtained even at low dose c onditions, a nd i t is e xpected that it w ill be possible to use the brain PET-CT scan as a basic data for the research on reduction of dose and improvement of image quality.